Rajput is foreign origin? - No, This is false

Some of website and foreigners claim that Rajputs are foreign origin and comes from huna but in India you can claim anything and comes with clean cheat.

False Aryan Invasion theory:
On 10 April, 1866 in London at a secret meeting held by the Royal Asiatic Society, They made a false Aryan Invasion theory so they can keep India in control.
Source: http://arisebharat.com/2008/01/21/bbc-accepts-that-the-aryan-invasion-theory-is-flawed/

I said about Aryan invasion theory for taking this as a proof that Foreign peoples try to use fake theory to get benefit and All of historian peoples who claim that Rajput/Kshatriya is a foreign origin was a British (Angrez or foreigner) but later some of Indian historian follow them and claims similar thing however most of their claims are proven false like they claim that Rajput  was either belong to Hunas or kushanas and shakas but recently proven that rajputs have nothing to do with kushanas, shakas and hunas and even western historians admit that chandellas, rathores, parmaras, kalachuris and gharavads are of indigenous stock.

Huns and Foreign origin settled in Rajputana?
This is also a misleading that we settled in Rajputana and become a Hindi but in India you can claim anything so I want to ask them some question?

If foreigner comes to your home then you will give us without fighting with them? No one will write about this on books/script that foreigner occupied your land and home?

There is no any proof of a war and any story that Rajputs settled in Rajputana or become a hindu but of-course in India you can claim that sun rise from north and set in your home without any scientific proof.